Total Pageviews

Monday, 23 February 2015

Facebook launches an Australia-wide Be Bold, Stop Bullying campaign against trolls JESSICA MARSZALEK HERALD SUN (what a fucking joke facebook takes it up the arse)

Facebook social media
Facebook has moved against the thousands of trolls who use its pages to taunt others, launching a "Be Bold, Stop Bullying" campaign. Picture: AP
FACEBOOK has moved against the thousands of trolls who use its pages to taunt others, launching an Australia-wide Be Bold, Stop Bullying campaign.
From today, the global social networking giant is asking every Australian user to stamp out the behaviour by being brave enough to stand up to bullies when they spot them.
The central feature of the campaign is an interactive app where adults and children alike pledge to rail against bullying.
"I will take a stand when I see young people humiliating or hurting each other," the pledge for students reads.
"I will not use my phone or computer to spread rumours or say hateful things, and I won't ignore it when others are cruel and intimidating."
Adults can promise to recognise bullying is not "young people being young people" and work with schools, coaches and parents to eradicate it, especially if their own child is involved.
The app includes a map showing how many people in each state are prepared to take a stand and also provides information on where to go for help.
Today's launch - by School Education Minister Peter Garrett and celebrity DJ Ruby Rose - follows a similar campaign in the US in which one million people signed on.
It comes amid a growing trend of school Facebook "burn books" on which teens ridicule teachers and students with offensive comments and unflattering photos.
Charlotte Dawson
After spending two days under observation at St Vincent's Psychiatric Emergency Care Centre, Charlotte Dawson has been released and is now staying with friends
Among the examples found by the Herald Sun were that of a male teacher implied to be a paedophile and a shirtless photo of a male student taken off their private page and used as a target for derogatory jokes.
A theme across many of the pages are that female teachers and students are hookers and porn stars, with supposed bad dress sense and weight pointed out.
Students of both sexes are accused of being involved in weird sex acts, and racist jokes feature.
Headspace chief executive Chris Tanti, whose mental health advocacy group supports the campaign, said people often ramped up their aggression on sites like Facebook because they couldn't see the reaction of their target.
But the effects could leave a giant wound and drive people to despair, he said.
"The campaign is really about the bystander and for the bystander to stop being a bystander and get involved," Mr Tanti said.
He said people should stop believing bullying was a normal "right of passage"

Facebook announces 24-hour 'police hotline' after critics ... www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Facebook-announces-24-hour-police-hotline-cri... Apr 13, 2010 - Facebook announces 'police hotline' but STILL refuses to install 'panic ... its 23million users Facebook today said it had redesigned its abuse ...

Facebook will establish a 24-hour police hotline and allow its users to report suspicious behaviour directly to child protection agencies in response to criticism that it is failing to protect children from online predators. 
However, the website has continued to resist calls to install a 'panic button' on its pages after today announcing a raft of new measures to 'transform social networking safety'.
It comes after it was accused of complacency in the face of soaring numbers of complaints about online paedophiles.
Crackdown: Users of Facebook will now have access to a 24-hour police hotline under changes to improve security (file photo)
Crackdown: Users of Facebook will now have access to a 24-hour police hotline under changes to improve security but will still not have access to a panic button (file photo)
Child protection teams say cases involving bullies and sexual predators have trebled on the networking site this year.
The announcement follows a four-hour showdown in Washington DC with Facebook chiefs and Jim Gamble, Britain's most senior official responsible for protecting youngsters online.
Though Mr Gamble said Facebook had not not agreed to his demands outright, he acknowledged the popular social networking destination was 'one small step from doing the right thing'.
Its resistance over calls for the creation of a 'panic button' has created an increasingly bitter and public feud.
Mr Gamble said the button, which has cross-party political support in Britain and is backed by leading child and anti-bullying charities, should be given prominent use.
In order to protect its 23million users Facebook today said it had redesigned its abuse reporting system so people could alert the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre to any unwanted or inappropriate contact.
Managers also agreed to establish a new 24-hour police hotline, dedicated to helping with emergencies, investigations and prosecutions.
The site came under fire recently following the conviction of serial rapist Peter Chapman, who posed as a young boy on the site and went on to murder schoolgirl Ashleigh Hall.
Last week Mr Gamble revealed Facebook has never passed a concern to British police and that complaints about the site were spiralling.
Safety experts today hailed Facebook's new measures, which are designed to give individuals greater control of their online safety.
Independent child protection expert Mark Williams-Thomas termed the move a 'considerable step forward in online safety' while Stephen Balkam, CEO of the Family Online Safety Institute, said the site was taking 'a thoughtful, proactive approach to safety on the web'.
Peter Chapman
Ashleigh Hall
Security concerns: Facebook came under fire after it was revealed predator Peter Chapman posed as a young boy on the site to lure Ashleigh Hall to her death
'A co-ordinated approach providing the additional reporting to Ceop is clearly worthwhile, as is a dedicated phone line for law enforcement,' Mr Williams-Thomas said.
'I firmly believe that education is key to keeping children and young people safe online and social networking sites need to show a commitment to work with both statutory and voluntary organisation to promote safety on the internet.'
The new safety measures will include a 'safety centre' to supply parents, teachers, teenagers and police with improved resources.
To back up the series of initiatives, the site will invest another £5million in education and awareness.
It will also provide safety organisations with one billion advertisements on the site over the next two years to ensure users know what to do if they feel threatened.
Elliot Schrage, Vice President of Global Communications and Public Policy at Facebook, said there was no single answer to making the internet safer.
But he added: 'The investments and partnerships we've announced today - in direct reporting, in education and awareness, and in greater support for law enforcement - will transform social networking safety and security,' he said.
'They represent the most comprehensive public/private safety initiative since social networking began in the UK almost a decade ago.'
The company has now called on the Government to consider new ways in which to share information about registered sex offenders securely with social networks.
They believe this could help prevent dangerous individuals from accessing their services.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265610/Facebook-announces-24-hour-police-hotline-critics-slam-site-protecting-children.html#ixzz3SdyhdyLX
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Report abuse phone number for facebook? - Yahoo Answers https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid... Apr 10, 2012 - 650-543-4800. Facebook currently doesnt offer telephone support but you can leave a message at that number. in your message tell them you want ...


Best Answer
  • ? answered 3 years ago
650-543-4800 
Facebook currently doesnt offer telephone support but you can leave a message at that number.
in your message tell them you want the problem fixed or you will inform your attorney and take legal action. that may get them to notify you i hope!

best answer :D
  • 0
    0
  • Comment

Other Answers (2)

Relevance
  • Anonymous answered 1 month ago
    i like to report, this person (Marylace Buhia) she keep bothering me.. sending me bad messages and harrasing me, calling me *****. also, posting bad things and this person Cezzy Mc. she's posting bad words that i don't like. i just want that you close their account and i don't care if they will make new fb account this is there message that they keep sending me. the other account that she use the name is (Fem Buchanan.)


    No wonder why you have no filipino friends coz all of them was avoiding you becoz of your attitude. Your so paranoid shut your mouth and think about it you started it. Thats why your guilty
    No wonder why your isolated around your man coz you have no friend to hang out or party with. So now coz you have more money go buy some friends that you can symphaty with. No body is being plastic your the one who is plastic so stop whining on your FB your just showing your guilty and concited.... IF YOUR NOT GUILTY YOU WONT REACT IF YOUR NOT PLACTIC YOU WONT SAY ANYTHING. YOU DON'T KNOW ME WELL *****!! ans she message me that if i unblock her account she will keep attacking me. just want that you close her account. is that possible that you guy's can close their fb account?
    • 0
      0
    • Comment
  • Linda answered 10 months ago
    Please help me.....This is the 10th time I'm reporting Donna Lambert.....Donna has been harassing me and my friends for over 2 years now....She is sending messages to my personal friends and bashing me...
    I would love this to be stopped ASAP....She has written on facebook and sending messages sending hate speech and violating my personal rights....I don't want anything to do with her and want this stopped...
    Donna has caused many problems for a lot of people and says she is not afraid of anything....
    Thank you
    Linda Davies
    6197880007

Facebook Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Message ... thenextweb.com/facebook/.../facebook-hit-class-action-lawsuit-private-m... Dec 26, 2014 - It's not as jolly a holiday this year for Facebook, as the social network is facing a class action lawsuit in the US for having scanned users' private ...

It’s not as jolly a holiday this year for Facebook, as the social network is facing a class action lawsuit in the US for having scanned users’ private messages without their consent, reports Engadget.
Judge Phyllis Hamilton ruled in an Oakland, California court on Tuesday that Facebook must face a class action lawsuit for violating its users’ privacy by scanning private messages so that it could gather data for targeted advertising.
While Facebook argued that their actions are covered by an exception under the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act for interceptions by service providers occurring in the ordinary course of business, the court said that Facebook hadn’t explained how this practice fell within said ordinary course of business, according to a Reuters report.
The lawsuit was filed two years ago, and could benefit any Facebook user who sent or received links via its private messaging system since then. The suit seeks damages of up to $10,000 to be paid out per user, and also for Facebook to stop scanning messages from here on out.
Given that Facebook makes most of its money from advertising, it’s likely that the company will fight this case tooth and nail to not only avoid payouts, but also to continue to peek at messages and build more comprehensive profiles of their users for targeted marketing.
We’ve reached out to Facebook for comment, and will update the post as soon as we hear back.

Student starts global class action against Facebook | Reuters www.reuters.com/.../us-facebook-austria-lawsuit-idUSKBN0G13O02014... Aug 1, 2014 - ... a billion Facebook users around the world on Friday to join a class-action lawsuit against Facebook's alleged violations of its users' privacy,

Student starts global class action against Facebook

VIENNA Fri Aug 1, 2014 8:16am EDT
A Facebook logo on an Ipad is reflected among source code on the LCD screen of a computer, in this photo illustration taken in Sarajevo June 18, 2014.  REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Files
A Facebook logo on an Ipad is reflected among source code on the LCD screen of a computer, in this photo illustration taken in Sarajevo June 18, 2014.
CREDIT: REUTERS/DADO RUVIC/FILES
(Reuters) - Austrian law student Max Schrems appealed to a billion Facebook users around the world on Friday to join a class-action lawsuit against Facebook's alleged violations of its users' privacy, stepping up a years-long data-protection campaign.
Schrems, a thorn in Facebook's side who has a case involving the social network pending at the European Court of Justice, has filed a claim at Vienna's commercial court and invited others to join the action at www.fbclaim.com using their Facebook login.
Under Austrian law, a group of people may transfer their financial claims to a single person - in this case, Schrems. Legal proceedings are then effectively run as a class action.
Schrems is claiming damages of 500 euros ($670) per user for alleged data violations, including aiding the U.S. National Security Agency in running its Prism program, which mined the personal data of users of Facebook and other web services.
The 26-year-old is also seeking injunctions under EU data-protection law at the court in data-privacy-friendly Austria. "Our aim is to make Facebook finally operate lawfully in the area of data protection," he said.
Facebook has come under fire before for allegedly violating data-protection laws.
Most recently, Britain's data watchdog began investigating whether a 2012 experiment on unwitting users, in which it tried to alter their emotional state to see if their postings turned more positive or negative.
The world's biggest social network, Facebook now has 1.32 billion users. It posted a 61 percent increase in sales in the second quarter thanks to mobile advertising, sending its shares to a record high and valuing the company at almost $200 billion.
Facebook declined to comment on the Schrems case on Friday.
POINTING THE FINGER
Users from anywhere outside the United States and Canada may sign up to join the Austrian case, since Facebook runs all its international operations from Ireland, another EU country. The case relies largely on the EU Data Protection Directive. Europe in general has stricter data-protection rules than the United States and considers itself more privacy-conscious.
But its history of enforcing data protection is mixed, bar a few high-profile cases such as the ECJ's ruling in May that compels internet companies to remove irrelevant or excessive personal information from search results.
"We have this habit of pointing the finger at the United States, but we're not enforcing our rights anyway," Schrems told Reuters. "If we can get a class action through like this, it will send out a huge signal to the industry overall."
Schrems has had limited success pursuing cases in Ireland, home to the European or international headquarters of some of the largest U.S. technology companies, including Microsoft and Google, who employ thousands there.
His europe-v-facebook group appealed to the Irish High Court to rule on allegations that U.S. companies helped the NSA harvest private data from EU citizens after the Irish data watchdog said there were no grounds for an investigation.
The High Court referred the case to the ECJ.
Schrems's Austrian court case relies on EU law for the alleged data violations, which also include tracking of users on external websites through Facebook's "like" button and unauthorized sharing of user data with external applications.
The claims for damages will have to be assessed under more financially generous California law, Schrems said, since Facebook says California law governs its terms of service.
A specialist financier will bear the legal costs if Schrems loses the case and will take 20 percent of the damages if he wins, meaning users can join the case at no financial risk.
Schrems himself is not charging a fee but stands to win 500 euros, like the other claimants.
($1 = 0.7473 Euros)

(Editing by Larry King)

Native American activist to sue Facebook over site's 'real ... www.theguardian.com › Technology › Facebook 5 days ago - Dana Lone Hill to bring class action lawsuit against policy that has provoked ire from groups who want their identities protected online.

Dana Lone Hill to bring class action lawsuit against policy that has provoked ire from groups who want their identities protected online
Mark Zuckerberg
President, founder and CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg speaks during a Reuters interview at the University of Bogota last month. Photograph: Jose Miguel Gomez/Reuters
A Native American activist plans to lead a class action lawsuit against Facebook over its “real name” policy, which has drawn the ire of drag queens, domestic abuse survivors and political activists across the globe.
The policy that once required users to use only their “real name” for their profiles came under renewed scrutiny last year after drag queens in San Francisco reported being locked out of their accounts. Facebook restored the accounts, amended its policy and apologized – but groups who want their identities protected online say the changes are not enough.
Dana Lone Hill is one of many Native Americans to report being suspended from their Facebook accounts, a process that blocks users from accessing any profile information until they provide proof of identity by handing over documents. Lone Hill was suspended after changing the account from her mother’s last name, Lone Hill, to her father’s last name, Lone Elk. Once her case was covered by national news outlets, service was restored.
“I want to bring this lawsuit for Native America because these are our real names, these are the names that we were given, these were the names we were born with,” Lone Hill said.
She and other members of the community suspect that part of the problem is that Native American names mix adjectives and nouns – leading them to look more suspicious under Facebook’s enforcement system.
“I’m not saying it’s racism, I’m just saying they need to fix the system,” said Lone Hill.
That system is closely guarded – even from activists who have been working with Facebook to reform its policies. What is known is that Facebook does not proactively search for names; instead, users flag names and a worldwide team looks at such reports to determine their legitimacy.
“They have made it very clear that they don’t want to share how enforcement works because they think people will game the system,” said Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) activist Nadia Kayyali, who has discussed the policy with Facebook in private meetings.
Kayyali said this was ironic because people are using the existing system to target groups.
“If you continue to have ‘this account is using a fake name’ as a reporting option, that seems like you are encouraging people to just be harassing people by filing these reports as opposed to dealing with the behavior itself,” said Kayyali. “So they should really just get rid of the policy.”
Kayyali said groups including LGBT youth, abuse survivors and political activists were particularly harmed by the policy.
In 2014, activists in Vietnam and Syria reported being booted off the site in suspected targeted attacks by opposition forces, including the government. “In other places, [Facebook] is actually the form people use to speak out, so they are very much in danger of being targeted by aggressive governments,” said Kayyali.
Facebook has long said that its policy on not allowing anonymous users is meant to limit abuse, though some, like Kayyali, think it encourages it.
“Having people use their authentic names makes them more accountable, and also helps us root out accounts created for malicious purposes, like harassment, fraud, impersonation and hate speech,” a Facebook spokesperson said in a statement.
The company has expanded identification options to include allowing documentation that shows a user’s “authentic name”. This means providing two forms of identification that include a legal name and one piece of government-issued identification with a photo or birthday that matches the user’s profile.
Facebook said it has made “significant improvements” in the last several months, including the expansion to let people use their “authentic name” instead of only their “real name”.
“We have more work to do, and our teams will continue to prioritize these improvements so everyone can be their authentic self on Facebook,” the company said.
Part of the process has made EFF and members of the San Francisco drag communityde facto customer service agents for Facebook. Lil Miss Hot Mess is a San Francisco drag queen who has been working with Facebook to communicate the needs of people who do not want to use their legal name on their accounts. On an average day, she sends 10 to 20 messages to Facebook containing information regarding people whose accounts have been erroneously suspended.
Lil Miss Hot Mess said Facebook had promised changes that would help stop people from targeting communities and erroneously reporting its members, and to help people appeal cases in which they have been unfairly or erroneously reported.
“Though we haven’t seen those changes yet,” she said.
“We’re happy that Facebook is sort of taking small steps to make it more difficult for people to falsely accuse people of using fake names, but I still think there is this bigger issue of: do we have a right to choose our name on social media?” said Lil Miss Hot Mess. “And unfortunately even the move to the sort of authentic identity language hasn’t really addressed that.”
The class action lawsuit is focused on Native Americans who say that they have been harmed by this policy. The drag queen coalition is also in communication with Lone Hill, though they are not involved in the lawsuit. “We see this as a broader issue that affects drag queens to Native Americans to survivors of domestic violence and transgender youth,” Lil Miss Hot Mess said.

Fraley v. Facebook, Inc. www.fraleyfacebooksettlement.com/ A class action lawsuit against Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") claimed that Facebook unlawfully used Class Members' names, profile pictures, photographs, ...

Important Update: Final Approval Granted

The Court issued its Order Granting Motion for Final Approval of Settlement Agreement on August 26, 2013, and the Final Judgment on September 19, 2013, both of which can be viewed under the Court Documents menu above. However, appeals have been filed. Before any settlement payments can be made, all appeals filed must be resolved. This website will keep you informed of the progress of the Settlement.

Overview of the Proposed Settlement

Fraley, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al., Case No. CV-11-01726 RS
If you or your child have or have had a Facebook account and a Facebook Sponsored Story featured your or your child’s name or profile picture, you or your child may be a “Class Member” in a class action lawsuit (the "Action").
Sponsored Stories are a form of advertising that typically contain posts which appear on facebook.com about or from a Facebook user or entity that a business, organization, or individual has paid to promote so there is a better chance that the posts will be seen by the user or entity’s chosen audience. For more information about Sponsored Stories, please review the Notice.
A class action lawsuit against Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") claimed that Facebook unlawfully used Class Members’ names, profile pictures, photographs, likenesses, and identities to advertise or sell products and services through Sponsored Stories, without obtaining Class Members’ consent. Facebook denies any wrongdoing and any liability whatsoever. No court or other entity has made any judgment or other determination of any liability.

What Relief Does the Settlement Provide to Class Members?

Facebook has agreed to:
  1. Pay $20 million into a fund that can be used, in part, to pay claims of Class Members (including Minor Subclass Members) who appeared in a Sponsored Story. Each participating Class Member may be eligible to receive up to $10. The amount, if any, paid to each Authorized Claimant depends upon the number of claims made. No one knows in advance how much each Authorized Claimant will receive, or whether any money will be paid directly to Authorized Claimants. If the number of claims made renders it economically infeasible to pay money to persons who make a timely and valid claim, payment will be made to the not-for-profit organizations identified in Section 7 of the Notice. These organizations are involved in educational outreach that teaches adults and children how to use social media technologies safely, or are involved in research of social media, with a focus on critical thinking around advertising and commercialization, and particularly with protecting the interests of children.
  2. Revise its terms of service (known as the “Statement of Rights and Responsibilities”) relating to Sponsored Stories.
  3. Give users (and minor users’ parents or legal guardians) additional information about and control over the use of their (and their children’s) names and profile pictures in Sponsored Stories.
For a complete description of Settlement benefits, please see Section 7 in the FAQ section of this website.

What Are My Options?

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT
SUBMIT A
CLAIM FORM
This was the only way to be eligible to receive a payment, if the Court orders payment to Class Members.Deadline:
May 2, 2013
EXCLUDE YOURSELFThis was the only option that allowed you to retain the ability to file your own lawsuit about the legal claims in this case.Deadline:
May 2, 2013
OBJECTYou had the option to write to the Court about why you wished to object to (i.e., don’t like) the Settlement and think it shouldn’t be approved.Deadline:
May 2, 2013
GO TO THE "FAIRNESS HEARING"The Court held a “Fairness Hearing” on June 28, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. to consider the Settlement, the request for attorneys’ fees and expenses of the lawyers who brought the Action (“Class Counsel”), and the class representatives’ request for service awards for bringing the Action. You could have, but were not required to, speak at the Fairness Hearing about any Objection you filed, if you had done so. If you intended to speak at the Fairness Hearing, you must have followed the procedures set forth in theNotice when you served your Objection.Hearing Date:
June 28, 2013
at 10:00 a.m.
DO NOTHINGYou will not receive a payment, even if the Court orders payment to Class Members. You will also be giving up your right to bring your own lawsuit related to the claims in the Action. You may be eligible to receive the non-monetary benefits of the Settlement, if the Settlement is finally approved.No deadline
Please consult the Notice for more details on the Settlement.
The Court in charge of this Action has approved the Settlement, however, appeals have been filed. Relief to Class Members will be provided only after the appeals are resolved in favor of the Settlement. Please be patient.

Facebook facing class-action lawsuit for ‘invasive scanning’ of private messages

A judge ruled this week that a class-action lawsuit could proceed.
A judge ruled this week that a class-action lawsuit could proceed. Source: Getty Images
FACEBOOK could be forced to pay users up to $US10,000 ($A12,300) each for violating their privacy if a new lawsuit is successful.
A judge in the US District Court ruled on Wednesday that a class-action suit against the social media giant can proceed.
According to the lawsuit, originally filed in December 2013, Facebook scanned the content of users’ private messages for advertising purposes, violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and California’s privacy and unfair competition laws.
Whenever users included links to third-party websites in messages, Facebook would follow the link and search for information to profile the sender’s browsing activity, it was alleged.
According to court documents, Facebook would also treat a link to a website within a private message as the user having ‘liked’ that page via the embedded social share button.
Facebook had attempted to dismiss the suit by claiming the “interceptions” were lawful because they occurred in the “ordinary course” of its business.
Facebook allegedly scanned private messages for web links.
Facebook allegedly scanned private messages for web links. Source: Supplied
Judge Phyllis Hamilton slapped down that argument this week, arguing Facebook had “not offered a sufficient explanation of how the challenged practice falls within the ordinary course of its business”.
She also hit out at Facebook’s suggestion that “any activity that generates revenue for a company should be considered within the ‘ordinary course of its business’”.
“At the hearing, Facebook’s counsel suggested that, because the practice is in the service of making money, it must necessarily fall within the ordinary course of business,” she said.
“However ... An electronic communications service provider cannot simply adopt any revenue-generating practice and deem it ‘ordinary’ by its own subjective standard.”
While Facebook ceased the practice in 2012, the company says it still analyses messages to protect against viruses and spam.
Google has come under fire for a similar message-scanning system.
The Facebook class-action would cover any Facebook user in the US who sent or received a private message in the last two years that included a web link.
Facebook has been contacted for comment.